When I Grow Up:
Becoming a Pathologist.
The following discussion is adapted from an email
correspondence exchange between
myself and the students of Johnston Middle School,
Johnston, Iowa, in February, 1999.
What is Pathology?
Pathology is the study of diseases
that occur in humans (human pathology)
or in non-human animals (veterinary pathology).
Many questions about pathology are
answered in more detail if you go to the
website entitled, The Lightning Hypertext of Disease,
which I wrote in collaboration with four other
pathologists. You can reach
The Lightning Hypertext of Disease
on the Internet at:
http://www.pathinfo.com/
The Lightning Hypertext of Disease
is a commercial website, but you can ask
as many questions as you wish for free.
WARNING: Many of the answers
you will receive are highly technical,
and written in the specialized jargon
of medicine.
What education is required to be a pathologist?
Human pathologists must have a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.)
or Doctor or Osteopathy (D.O.), plus five years of additional training
in a pathology residency program.
Veterinary pathologists must have
a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (D.V.M.)
and additional specialty training.
How did I become interested in Pathology?
I became interested in biology and medicine
research when I was a middle school student.
I participated in Science Fairs, which
were an opportunity for young scientists
to show their work to their peers (that is,
among other young scientists),
as well as to adult judges.
I chose to go into medicine,
because this is a practical
area where you can immediately help other people.
I chose pathology because it is one of the
most scientific branches of medicine,
and because it is one of the few branches
of medicine, along with general family practice
and radiology, where you can work with diseases
of the entire body. Most other medical specialists
work with a particular area of the body,
like the brain, the eyes, the skin,
the chest, the abdomen, etc.
What electronic tools are used in pathology?
At this moment in history, there are not
many electronic tools in the routine
pathology laboratory, outside
of computers to perform ordinary
office functions, like email and fax.
There has been a lot of discussion
about an emerging area, namely,
TELEPATHOLOGY, in which a pathologist
in one location looks at specimens
under a microscope which is physically located
hundreds of miles away. This has been
suggested especially for remote,
sparsely populated areas, which do
not have enough work to employ
a full-time pathologist. Right now,
telepathology is still very experimental,
and many of the problems have not yet
been worked out.
How important are autopsies?
Autopsies have always been very important
in societies with a sophisticated medical
culture, like the United States.
There are many medical questions that you can
determine from autopsy studies that
cannot be answered any other way.
There are two basic types of autopsy:
MEDICAL (asking why a patient died in a hospital);
and FORENSIC (asking why a patient died
under suspicious circumstances).
You might wish to enter FORENSIC
as a keyword in The Lightning Hypertext of Disease.
In my job, I perform medical-type autopsies.
Medical-type autopsies are important
in studying the progress of diseases,
like heart-disease and cancer,
and determining whether certain
treatments have helped the patients.
There is a Latin saying that every
pathologist knows: Mortuí vivós docent.
The dead teach the living.
Most states have a MEDICAL EXAMINER,
a group of pathologists who have
additional training in forensic-type
autopsies, and who perform autopsies
on persons who died under suspicious circumstances.
Every pathologist, of course, has some
training in forensic pathology.
In my job, if I think that a crime
has been committed, I consult with
the medical examiner.
In recent years, the number of medical-type
autopsies performed in this country
has decreased greatly, but the number of
forensic-type autopsies has remained steady.
I think that the decrease in medical-type autopsies
is a mistake, but I am not allowed to decide whether
to request an autopsy.
Does it hurt the family to have and autopsy?
In my opinion, it never hurts the family
to have an autopsy, unless the family objects
to an autopsy for religious or other personal reasons,
or the family is informed of the autopsy results in an
insensitive way. For example, in Muslim
cultures, autopsies are almost never performed.
In my opinion, the doctor who has cared for
the patient during life should always
interpret the autopsy report for the family.
The autopsy report is written in very technical
language, and non-medical people might be
offended or confused by what they read
in an autopsy report.
How do I feel when I do an autopsy?
Pathologists are usually thinking about
the technical parts of an autopsy when
they perform an autopsy. Why did the patient die?
Was the disease controlled as well as possible
by the treatments? Will there be any unexpected findings?
Pathologists almost never know the patient
that they autopsy, and they become accustomed
to the gruesome parts of the autopsy.
If you can't get used to working with dead bodies,
then it doesn't make much sense to become a pathologist.
Still, even pathologists have feelings.
The autopsies that bother me the most
are the ones on young people about
your age who have suffered a great deal
before they died. We all have to die sometime,
but it seems to me that everyone should
have the chance to grow up first.
There is a joke among pathologists
that we think about food when we do autopsies.
Many findings seen at autopsy
are named after food, probably
because food is so familiar to everybody.
Examples: NUTMEG LIVER, CASEOUS NECROSIS,
BREAD AND BUTTER PERICARDITIS,
SUGAR-CAKE SPLEEN, etc.
You may enter PATHOLOGY FOOD
into The Lightning Hypertext of Disease
and see what you get.
What do pathologists do, besides autopsies?
It might surprise you to learn that non-medical-examiner
pathologists do not spend much of their time
performing autopsies these days. Pathologists like myself
spend most of their time looking at specimens
that surgeons and other doctors remove from
a living patient. We prepare the specimens and look
at them under the microscope, so we can tell
the patient's doctor what is wrong with the patient.
Most working days for a pathologist are about
the same as for other professional people,
like lawyers, teachers, and businessmen.
It is a long, somewhat unpredictable work-week,
but most pathologists do not work at extremely odd hours,
like surgeons or emergency-room doctors.
There ARE emergencies in pathology, but
they don't happen very often. Usually,
a pathologist must be called to the hospital
if a patient needs emergency surgery,
and the surgeon needs to know the diagnosis
(that is, what disease) before he/she finishes
the operation. In these emergencies,
the pathologist quick-freezes the specimen
that the surgeon removes from the patient,
and makes a diagnosis, so the surgeon
knows what to do next. Most routine specimens
in pathology take several days to process,
sometimes longer if there are special tests.
Does the autopsy always give a conclusive answer?
Every honest pathologist will admit that
at least one in ten medical-type autopsies
does not tell us why the patient died.
I don't know what the percentage is
in forensic autopsies, but it is probably
a lot smaller. Still, there are some
things so wierd that a criminal can do,
that you couldn't figure it out in your
wildest imagination. A German-speaking
pathologist once told me a little rhyme
about forensic autopsies.
If you won't be offended by a slightly
off-color joke, then you can enter the
keyword UMSUNST in The Lightning Hypertext of Disease.
(Don't worry; the rhyme is translated.)
How important are findings at the crime scene?
The crime scene can be very important,
depending on the particular case.
The pathologist's findings are only
part of the puzzle, and the observations
obtained at the crime scene are necessary to put
together the whole picture, and make sense
out of the autopsy results.