Police and City Responses to Current Issues: September, 2008
Any issues that continue, you can contact Valentina I. Ukwuoma, Bureau Head, Bureau Of Solid Waste at Valentina.Ukwuoma@baltimorecity.gov
As for parking, yes you need to call 311 and no you don't have to leave a number, but can remain anonymous if you do. But parking control rarely shows up. One of these says we will seriously have to begin a campaign to get them to perform better. Until then, I encourage anyone who does not get a response from parking control to e-mail the mayor's liaison, Karli Swift, at Karli.Swift@baltimorecity.gov In response to
Ding How Sanitation Issue
(original comments posted under "Grime and Public Nuisance" January 23, 2008)...As for Ding How, that was their grease barrel. They did not have a minor privelege to have it there and were fined. In response to
Graffitti
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" June 28, 2008)
And if you do happen to catch a snapshot of a graffitti offender, please email us the shot and we'll post it. In response to
Gough Street Shooting
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" May 24, 2008)
In response to
Kressen Street Crime
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" Various dates in 2008)
In response to
Canton Crime, Gas Station, Mugging, Slow Response Time From Police
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" Various dates in Spring, 2008)
In response to
Castle Street Fire Cleanup
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on February 26, 2008)
In response to
Car Break Ins
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on various ocassions)
In response to
Castle Street Issues, Fleet Street Rape
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" in November/December, 2007)
Police and City Responses to Current Issues: November 9, 2007 In response to
Fell's Point Square Perv
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on November 2, 2007, lifted from an e-mail sent earlier)The complaintant, who left contact info in the original e-mail sent to us a few weeks ago, is being contacted by the police who have commented the following: "I spoke with Officer Faisano and he knows who the individual is. Can you get back in touch with the complainant and ask her if she is interested in pursuingcharges? Officer Faisano will put together a photo line-up for her. In response to
Kresson Street Issues (Various Blog Entries)
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on different days)All recent calls to police were tallied regarding this area. There were 129 calls for service during the past 90 days. Out of the 129 calls only 2 - calls concerned narcotic activities and both calls were coded "no suspicious persons on the block upon arrival" no reports written. There were 24 police reports written: 7 - were theft reports (bad checks or property stolen from The Loading Dock) 6- were misc. towed vehicle reports. the remaining reports involved domestic disputes, missing person, injured person, and common assault reports. The calls police have received for service are not consistent with the staements on the blog. Interested residents are welcomed to attend the next Major's meeting at the Southeast District on 06 Aug. 07 and discuss their concerns privately with operation's Lt. Brown. and later...
1. The shootings are currently being investigated and Detectives are pursuing leads. At present no further information can be released.
3. The area is on the readout list for all three patrol shifts reflecting the request for special attention. Additionally operations officers have been in the area providing enhanced enforcement. In response to
Suspected Drug House at 425 S. Durham (Various Blog Entries)
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on different days)
In response to
Rape at Patterson Park
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on August 8, 2007)
Police and City Responses to Current Issues: June 22, 2007 In response to
Suspected Drug Houses (Various Addresses and Blog Entries)
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on different days)Regarding 3412 Mt. Pleasant Ave.: A search and seizure warrant has recently been executed at that address, and also at 3406 and 3408 Mt. Pleasant as well. The wheels are in motion there, as well as at other addresses who also recently had search and seizure warrants executed including 1905 Aliceanna St. 219 S. Duncan , 213 S. Register St. Additional information on these and others are pending and an update will be provided. Regarding the other addresses provided: comments are inappropriate at this time. Please check back. In response to
"Smedly's" Report of Crime Rash
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on May 11th)The Police Department has issued us the following feedback: "I have investigated your request for Information concerning Zoe's Garden, ID8, The Dominican Bar and the dog grooming establishment on Fleet St and 1700 Fleet St (Robberies). I checked the Database from 01/01/07 to present. None of the above listed business were listed on the database as being robbed. The following is a list of businesses that have been robbed in your area since January: Burger King 2033 Eastern Ave. 1/20/07 - warrant issued. The Colonial Inn 2001 Eastern Ave. 02/02/07 - Cleared by arrest. AAA Metro Temps 1701 Eastern Ave. 06/01/07 Not cleared. Bank of America 524 S. Broadway 02/02/07 not cleared. The remaining reported robberies were classified as occurring on the street. I also checked with Southeast District Burglary Detective , Derrick Layton concerning possible burglaries reported at the aforementioned businesses. Det Layton advised there were no reported burglaries at those locations." In response to
Crime at the Square, Trouble with Vagrants, and Vehicle Crimes along the Lancaster and surrounding Corridors (Various E-Mail and Blog Entries)
(original comments posted under "Crime Activity" on different days)It seems from the pattern of e-mails and blogs offered, a variety of different crime activity in the lower Fell's Point area may in fact be related. We have discussed the tremendous quality of life burden the constant infringements have resulted in, and the police, while maintaining that the area is constantly patrolled (point argued by some due to lack of evidence) seem to understand the need for greater action. There official comments are, "I advised Officers Fasano and Zayas of your concerns regarding Lancaster and the square (Vagrants) Officer Fasano has an entire book of the vagrants he has arrested in those areas. I also placed special attention notices in the Major's readout book. The info. regarding Larceny from autos and vagrants will be given special attention on all patrol shifts during there roll call prior to there tour of duty." Please continue to be vigilant and call the police to report crime activity, REGARDLESS OF PAST RESPONSES. Police and City Responses to Current Issues: January 31, 2007 In response to
Lack of Parking Control/Police Response to a 311 Call Made
About a Large Tow Truck Illegally Parked
(original comments posted under "Police (and City) Responsiveness Issues" -
January 26)Ken Strong from Parking Control (who is ultimately responsible) has not responded to our e-mails. The police have, and can't understand why this particular call for service took so long. Apparently, when a call doesn't get answered promptly, the breakdown or delay can occur in a variety of places. In order to monitor these breakdowns when they occur for feedback and accountability reasons, as well as to help avoid the service delays in general, the police offer the following advice: Document the date, time location and the nature of the complaint, include a full description when ever possible of suspects ie. sex, race, age, height, weight and clothing. Document vehicle information to include make, model, year, color, how many doors, and state tag number. Try to include compass points when given direction. (ie the car is parked on the southwest corner.) Also ask the 311 operator for a confirmation number. This will assist with any follow up and will help us determine what may have happened with your complaint. Also remember that all calls to 311 aren't always handled by the police. 311 sort calls according to the nature and type of call and then assign it to the city agency that is responsible ie parking complaints would be handled by Parking Enforcement. Each city agency has its own radio system for receiving calls for service. A call dispatched to parking enforcement would not be handled by the police department. This may explain why police officers did not stop to handle this parking complaint. You can choose to call 311 and request to speak with an officer about the nature of the complaint. Even then, the 311 operator still has the final decision on whether to send an police officer or someone from another city agency. The 911 operator will dispatch an officer only when you give the criteria for an emergency or a call that the police would otherwise handle. For example; There is a vehicle parked on the southwest corner that is suspicious; the driver parked illegally in front of a fire hydrant and I believe this vehicle maybe stolen, due to the way it has been there for the last few hours. If you whish to remain anonymous, get a crime watcher number (call NSU at 410 637 8848), or have the officer meet you at a location other then your home address. (ie the Royal Farms Store) and talk to the officer in person. Make sure you ID the officer for follow up later. In response to
Flier Littering and 311 Sanitation Responders Issuing Inappropriate "No Violation Found" Reports
(original comments about fliers posted under various categories, and "No "Violation Found" report posted under "Areas in Need of Attention, December 21st-)The Sanitation Department official Dale Thompson has issued the following feedback:
The primary business that seems to be the generator of the most SR's is the Latin Palace who has been cited numerous times for posting flyers without the owner's permission. Because of the number of complaints and the number of citations that have been issued for the posting violation as well as other violations, the Latin Palace has been referred to the Health Department for additional enforcement. The Health Inspector will visit the business and advise them that they must comply with all City codes or risk having their operating permit revoked." As for accountability issues regarding inappropriate "No Violation Found" reports to trash dumping or fliers, Ms. Thompson reports: "I will meet with the Computer Section to possibly add to the SR information to have more details in the SR results regarding why no violation. Usually when the SR states no violation it means that when the officer visited the property they did not find a flyer on the property when they did the inspection. Should the citizen have questions regarding the details of the officer's actions they can either call to speak to the Enforcement Captain, Captain Rich on 545-6497 or they can contact me on 396-8618." Police and City Responses to Current Issues: December 18, 2006 In response to
Trash Offenders on the 200, 300 and 400 block os S. Broadway
(original comments posted under "Trash Grime and Nuisance Issues" - Nov, 30, Dec. 8 and 12)
The Department of Solid Waste has convened a group of city, community and elected officials to help monitor and prevent the ongoing trash problem along the 200 400 blks of Broadway. Representatives from Sanitation Enforcement, Collections, Health Department, Councilman Kraft's office, the Mayor's Office of Hispanic Affairs and Office of Neighborhoods, the Assisi House, Fells Prospect and others have met to discuss this problem and have taken the following actions:
In response to the
Recent crime surge in the area of 1800 Eastern, 400 S. Ann, 400 S. Durham, 1700 Bank Street area (roughly one square block)
(original comments posted under "Just in: Recent Crime Activity" Nov. 10 and 13)
A new police camera has been installed at the corner of Eastern Avenue and Ann Street in response to recent crime activity there. Police cameras are statistically proven to deter crime, and to aid in the arrests of criminals who defy them.
In response to
Unsolicited Fliers Left on Cars in SE
(original comments posted under "Area's in Need of Attention" Nov. 25)
Two of the places of business have been contacte by SouthEast Baltimore CrimeWatch: Sonars and Huckas. Sonar has repetedly shown support for the elimination of this type of advertisement, and has been very firm with their promoters who disregard the law. They asked to be contacted whenever a Sonar flier is placed illegally. Additional comments and contact information for Sonar can be found in a december 6th entry under "Area's in Need of Attention". Huckas said they too were concerned with flyers being sent with the establishment's name on it. They said they received a letter from Councilman Kraft regarding the matter, and that these flyers were not made by Huckas, but rather distributed by groups that were hosting an event at the bar/restaurant. Huckas was asked to create a policy or warn those groups planning on hosting events there that if they continue such actions they would not be welcomed back. They were very nice and sounded concerned and would like to see this stopped as well.
Police Responses to Current Issues: November 29, 2006 In response to the
Police Officer Deferring Taking Action on a Truck Offender to Parking Control
(original comments posted under "Trash Grime and Nuisance Issues" - Nov, 26 and 27)
7th: Check out (baltimorecity.gov) click government and then click "law". In response to
Police not responding to a 911 call regarding car burglaries in progress
(original comments posted under "Just in: Recent Crime Activity" - Oct 31)Further investigation has located the records of three 911 calls made, one at 10:59pm, another at 11:00pm. Both of these calls were tagged "do not contact reporting person". The 3rd call was made at 11:04pm. This time, when asked if the reporting person would be available for contact if needed, the caller responded affirmatively. There is no record if this information was provided to the responding officer. At 11:28 an Officer Hibler responded to the call and cleared it based on the fact that he could not find the complainant. It's not clear if the officer did not get the information about contacting the reporting person, or if he deemed it was not necessary to do so. Also there may be a distinction between being available to speak to an officer, and requesting to speak to an officer, and the responding officer may have acted on this distinction. During conversation with a variety of city sources, it became clear that Baltimore City does not have the same policies that other counties do regarding responding to 911 calls. In Anne Arundel county, for instance, it is policy that every 911 call gets a follow up. In Baltimore City, there are "triage" and "time-out" policies that may prevent some calls from getting a response at all, based on perceived severity, officer availability, and whether or not a response was issued within a standard 20-minute time period. Police Responses to Current Issues: November 13, 2006 In response to the
Chronic Offenders who frequent the 400 block of S. Durham Street
(original comments posted under "Chronic Offenders")Follow up has continued, although there has been some interruption as key players have been on work-related medical leave. However residents have confirmed that the homeowner seems to be allowing the offender to stay there, despite assurances to the police that she would no longer be allowed in. Therefore, police have offered a variety of information on how to seek a "nuisance household" status for a particular property. Evan Helfrich, and A/S/A with Housing Court might be able to shed some light and guide the way. His phone number is (410) 396-4140. Additionally, Melvin Penn of BCPD will be attending several public meetings at which he will be happy to further discuss the ins and outs of pursuing an option of this sort (as well as offering other feedback on all your blog topics). A COP meeting is scheduled on November 16th at 2238 Eastern Avenue (2nd floor rear over the Chesapeake Bank). The meeting starts at 7pm. Tonight at the Patterson Park Neighborhood Association, Penn will also be a guest speaker. It's at 7pm, inside St. Elizabeth's Church at Baltimore and Lakewood. In response to
Police not responding to a 911 call regarding car burglaries in progress
(original comments posted under "Just in: Recent Crime Activity")Astonishingly enough, the police, who checked into this twice, found absolutely no record of this call, or any thing like it, having been made. We are still trying to figure out how all records of a very detailed 911 call can just vanish. Hopefully, there will be more information on this topic to come, as several other bloggers had shared similar 911 "no show" stories since then. In response to the
Flyer Offenders in SouthEast Baltimore
(original comments posted under "Areas in Need of Attention")One of the two offenders, Sonar in Baltimore, has been contacted. Their response has been very cooperative. In addition to offering the fact that they warn against this type of promotion, (and letting us know that they will step up on those warnings) they go a step further in taking full responsibility: ".....Also feel free to call me if it happens again. I would not mind sending whoever did it down there to clean up the any messes they made or even penalize an opening band or outside promoter they were the ones who did it." Full comments are posted under "Area's in Need of Attention" The other offender, Five NightClub in Washington has not been able to be reached for feedback. In response to the
Recent crime surge in the area of 1800 Eastern, 400 S. Ann, 400 S. Durham, 1700 Bank Street area (roughly one square block)
(original comments posted under "Just in: Recent Crime Activity")We are trying to get confirmation from police that they have been made aware of the particulars of this crime activity and will step up patrolling. We are also looking into whether or not arrests have been made. Key players are out on medical leave. Check back here for an update as soon as it is available. In response to the
Off duty police officer who reportedly responded aggressively and pulled a gun on an alleged drunk driver
(original comments posted under the initial introduction message)Without the video, identity of the officer, victim interview, or a variety of other information available, it is difficult to speak specifically about the incident, and comment as to whether or not the actions of the officer was clearly appropriate or not. Specifics about the comment "how inappropriate the officers language and questionable actions were during the situation" would also need to be shared. However, comments can be made about general policy and perception in such scenarios. First, an officer should not be withdrawing his weapon if he is impaired. However, for a variety of reasons, there is no rule about withdrawing a weapon after having indulged in alcohol. For some on-duty undercover or plain-clothes officers, having a drink may be necessary in protecting identity in certain circumstances. And in the case of off-duty officers (who are, of course, allowed to indulge), it's in everybody's best interest if they remain allowed to, if motivated, respond to any crimes they may witness. It is policy that an off-duty officer call for help before approaching a perpetrator. An off duty or plain-clothes officers will sometimes receive a different initial reaction as an officer in uniform, and this can often be a danger to all involved. So having other officers en route is important. Also, this will also often account for some behavioral changes on the part of the officer. For the sake of all, they need to communicate very clearly and immediately that they are a police officer and responding to a possible crime. A misunderstanding of either of those two important facts can be dangerous. The officer must be taken seriously from the start and will often act accordingly to do so. Finally, the way a police officer looks at a vehicle is not the same way the average person does. They know from training and experience that a 3,000 pound vehicle is a weapon-weather or not the person who is yielding that weapon intentionally plans on hurting anyone. People reacting nervously to an officer, or misunderstanding the officer's intent or instructions can seriously injure themselves or others with a vehicle. Therefore, under certain circumstances, an officer will often react to a person behind the wheel of a car in much the same manner as someone else who has in their possession a deadly weapon. Of course, none of this means that you didn't observe behavior that was excessive. As mentioned earlier, it's difficult to tell from the information provided and without continued follow up (an option that is certainly available, should witnesses wish to pursue it. In fact, the circumstances that affect how an officer behaves under such circumstances may explain somewhat excessive behavior in some instances, and be the extenuating circumstances for more significant excessive behavior in others.