%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %%Creator: groff version 1.19.1 %%CreationDate: Wed May 11 10:32:50 2005 %%DocumentNeededResources: font Courier %%DocumentSuppliedResources: procset grops 1.19 1 %%Pages: 11 %%PageOrder: Ascend %%DocumentMedia: Default 595 842 0 () () %%Orientation: Portrait %%EndComments %%BeginDefaults %%PageMedia: Default %%EndDefaults %%BeginProlog %%BeginResource: procset grops 1.19 1 %!PS-Adobe-3.0 Resource-ProcSet /setpacking where{ pop currentpacking true setpacking }if /grops 120 dict dup begin /SC 32 def /A/show load def /B{0 SC 3 -1 roll widthshow}bind def /C{0 exch ashow}bind def /D{0 exch 0 SC 5 2 roll awidthshow}bind def /E{0 rmoveto show}bind def /F{0 rmoveto 0 SC 3 -1 roll widthshow}bind def /G{0 rmoveto 0 exch ashow}bind def /H{0 rmoveto 0 exch 0 SC 5 2 roll awidthshow}bind def /I{0 exch rmoveto show}bind def /J{0 exch rmoveto 0 SC 3 -1 roll widthshow}bind def /K{0 exch rmoveto 0 exch ashow}bind def /L{0 exch rmoveto 0 exch 0 SC 5 2 roll awidthshow}bind def /M{rmoveto show}bind def /N{rmoveto 0 SC 3 -1 roll widthshow}bind def /O{rmoveto 0 exch ashow}bind def /P{rmoveto 0 exch 0 SC 5 2 roll awidthshow}bind def /Q{moveto show}bind def /R{moveto 0 SC 3 -1 roll widthshow}bind def /S{moveto 0 exch ashow}bind def /T{moveto 0 exch 0 SC 5 2 roll awidthshow}bind def /SF{ findfont exch [exch dup 0 exch 0 exch neg 0 0]makefont dup setfont [exch/setfont cvx]cvx bind def }bind def /MF{ findfont [5 2 roll 0 3 1 roll neg 0 0]makefont dup setfont [exch/setfont cvx]cvx bind def }bind def /level0 0 def /RES 0 def /PL 0 def /LS 0 def /MANUAL{ statusdict begin/manualfeed true store end }bind def /PLG{ gsave newpath clippath pathbbox grestore exch pop add exch pop }bind def /BP{ /level0 save def 1 setlinecap 1 setlinejoin 72 RES div dup scale LS{ 90 rotate }{ 0 PL translate }ifelse 1 -1 scale }bind def /EP{ level0 restore showpage }bind def /DA{ newpath arcn stroke }bind def /SN{ transform .25 sub exch .25 sub exch round .25 add exch round .25 add exch itransform }bind def /DL{ SN moveto SN lineto stroke }bind def /DC{ newpath 0 360 arc closepath }bind def /TM matrix def /DE{ TM currentmatrix pop translate scale newpath 0 0 .5 0 360 arc closepath TM setmatrix }bind def /RC/rcurveto load def /RL/rlineto load def /ST/stroke load def /MT/moveto load def /CL/closepath load def /Fr{ setrgbcolor fill }bind def /setcmykcolor where{ pop /Fk{ setcmykcolor fill }bind def }if /Fg{ setgray fill }bind def /FL/fill load def /LW/setlinewidth load def /Cr/setrgbcolor load def /setcmykcolor where{ pop /Ck/setcmykcolor load def }if /Cg/setgray load def /RE{ findfont dup maxlength 1 index/FontName known not{1 add}if dict begin { 1 index/FID ne{def}{pop pop}ifelse }forall /Encoding exch def dup/FontName exch def currentdict end definefont pop }bind def /DEFS 0 def /EBEGIN{ moveto DEFS begin }bind def /EEND/end load def /CNT 0 def /level1 0 def /PBEGIN{ /level1 save def translate div 3 1 roll div exch scale neg exch neg exch translate 0 setgray 0 setlinecap 1 setlinewidth 0 setlinejoin 10 setmiterlimit []0 setdash /setstrokeadjust where{ pop false setstrokeadjust }if /setoverprint where{ pop false setoverprint }if newpath /CNT countdictstack def userdict begin /showpage{}def /setpagedevice{}def }bind def /PEND{ clear countdictstack CNT sub{end}repeat level1 restore }bind def end def /setpacking where{ pop setpacking }if %%EndResource %%EndProlog %%BeginSetup %%BeginFeature: *PageSize Default << /PageSize [ 595 842 ] /ImagingBBox null >> setpagedevice %%EndFeature %%IncludeResource: font Courier grops begin/DEFS 52 dict def DEFS begin/u{.001 mul}bind def end/RES 72 def/PL 841.89 def/LS false def/ENC0[/asciicircum/asciitilde/Scaron /Zcaron/scaron/zcaron/Ydieresis/trademark/quotesingle/Euro/.notdef /.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef /.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/.notdef /.notdef/.notdef/.notdef/space/exclam/quotedbl/numbersign/dollar/percent /ampersand/quoteright/parenleft/parenright/asterisk/plus/comma/hyphen /period/slash/zero/one/two/three/four/five/six/seven/eight/nine/colon /semicolon/less/equal/greater/question/at/A/B/C/D/E/F/G/H/I/J/K/L/M/N/O /P/Q/R/S/T/U/V/W/X/Y/Z/bracketleft/backslash/bracketright/circumflex /underscore/quoteleft/a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i/j/k/l/m/n/o/p/q/r/s/t/u/v/w/x/y /z/braceleft/bar/braceright/tilde/.notdef/quotesinglbase/guillemotleft /guillemotright/bullet/florin/fraction/perthousand/dagger/daggerdbl /endash/emdash/ff/fi/fl/ffi/ffl/dotlessi/dotlessj/grave/hungarumlaut /dotaccent/breve/caron/ring/ogonek/quotedblleft/quotedblright/oe/lslash /quotedblbase/OE/Lslash/.notdef/exclamdown/cent/sterling/currency/yen /brokenbar/section/dieresis/copyright/ordfeminine/guilsinglleft /logicalnot/minus/registered/macron/degree/plusminus/twosuperior /threesuperior/acute/mu/paragraph/periodcentered/cedilla/onesuperior /ordmasculine/guilsinglright/onequarter/onehalf/threequarters /questiondown/Agrave/Aacute/Acircumflex/Atilde/Adieresis/Aring/AE /Ccedilla/Egrave/Eacute/Ecircumflex/Edieresis/Igrave/Iacute/Icircumflex /Idieresis/Eth/Ntilde/Ograve/Oacute/Ocircumflex/Otilde/Odieresis /multiply/Oslash/Ugrave/Uacute/Ucircumflex/Udieresis/Yacute/Thorn /germandbls/agrave/aacute/acircumflex/atilde/adieresis/aring/ae/ccedilla /egrave/eacute/ecircumflex/edieresis/igrave/iacute/icircumflex/idieresis /eth/ntilde/ograve/oacute/ocircumflex/otilde/odieresis/divide/oslash /ugrave/uacute/ucircumflex/udieresis/yacute/thorn/ydieresis]def /Courier@0 ENC0/Courier RE %%EndSetup %%Page: 1 1 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF(Network Working Group)56.692 84.944 Q(B. Lilly)309.6 E 338.4(Internet\255Draft March)56.692 96.944 R(2005)7.2 E (Updates: 822, 2822 \(if approved\))56.692 108.944 Q (Intended status: Standards Track)56.692 120.944 Q (Expires: September 15, 2005)56.692 132.944 Q (Message Header From Field Made Optional)175.492 156.944 Q 215.092 168.944 EBEGIN [/Author (B. Lilly) /Title (Message Header From Field Made Optional) /DOCINFO pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(draft\255lilly\255from\255optional\25502)215.092 168.944 Q(Status of this Memo)56.692 192.944 Q (By submitting this Internet\255Draft, the author represents that any) 78.292 216.944 Q (applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he is aware have been) 78.292 228.944 Q (or will be disclosed, and any of which he becomes aware will be)78.292 240.944 Q(disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.)78.292 252.944 Q (Internet\255Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering) 78.292 276.944 Q (Task Force \(IETF\), its areas, and its working groups.)78.292 288.944 Q(Note that)14.4 E (other groups may also distribute working documents as)78.292 300.944 Q (Internet\255Drafts.)78.292 312.944 Q(Internet\255Drafts are draft docu\ ments valid for a maximum of six months)78.292 336.944 Q (and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any) 78.292 348.944 Q 7.2(time. It)78.292 360.944 R (is inappropriate to use Internet\255Drafts as reference)7.2 E (material or to cite them other than as "work in progress.")78.292 372.944 Q(The list of current Internet\255Drafts can be accessed at) 78.292 396.944 Q(http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id\255abstracts.txt.)78.292 408.944 Q (The list of Internet\255Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at) 78.292 432.944 Q(http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.)78.292 444.944 Q (Copyright Notice)56.692 468.944 Q 7.2(Copyright \251 The)78.292 492.944 R(Internet Society \(2005\).)7.2 E(Abstract)56.692 516.944 Q (The requirement for the presence of a syntactically\255valid message) 78.292 540.944 Q (header From field in the Internet Message Format presents a problem) 78.292 552.944 Q(in some circumstances.)78.292 564.944 Q (This memo \(if approved\) amends the Internet)14.4 E (Message Format specifications to make that field optional.)78.292 576.944 Q (Discussion of the subject matter covered in this memo has taken place) 78.292 588.944 Q(on the ietf\255822 mailing list, and that would be a s\ uitable place for)78.292 600.944 Q(discussion of this document.)78.292 612.944 Q 56.692 636.944 EBEGIN [/Title (1. Introduction) /Dest (S1.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 636.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S1.) /Page 1 /View [ /FitH 192 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(1. Introduction)56.692 636.944 Q (The Internet Message Format specification [N1.STD11], [N2.RFC2822]) 78.292 660.944 Q (requires a From field in the message header with a field body)78.292 672.944 Q(consisting of a non\255empty list of mailboxes for the messag\ e authors.)78.292 684.944 Q (There are at least two situations where such a list is not practical:) 78.292 696.944 Q 14.4(a. The)78.292 720.944 R (author has no mailbox \([N1.STD11] example A.2.6 uses the)7.2 E (sender's mailbox and associates it with a display name different) 114.292 732.944 Q (from that of the true sender, which may lead to confusion\).)114.292 744.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires)56.692 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E ([Page 1])108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 2 2 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)20.182 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E ([N2.RFC2822] section 3.6.2 states that the [N1.STD11] A.2.6)77.782 108.944 Q (practice of using a mailbox other than the author's is strongly)77.782 120.944 Q(deprecated, but does not offer a viable alternative.)77.782 132.944 Q 14.4(b. The)41.782 156.944 R (author or authors require anonymity \(e.g. whistle\255blowing or)7.2 E (political dissidence\))77.782 168.944 Q (The fundamental problem is that the Message Format specification)41.782 192.944 Q(requires supplying information which in some circumstances is) 41.782 204.944 Q (unavailable, and in other circumstances may be harmful, even lethal.) 41.782 216.944 Q (Several approaches to resolving the problem have been considered:) 41.782 228.944 Q 14.4(a. As)41.782 252.944 R (mentioned, the [N1.STD11] example A.2.6 method may lead to)7.2 E (confusion; worse, use of a mailbox for someone other than the)77.782 264.944 Q(message author may result in harm to an individual or group) 77.782 276.944 Q(unrelated to the message.)77.782 288.944 Q 14.4(b. One) 41.782 312.944 R (might use a syntactically valid but unresolvable domain name)7.2 E (in the mailbox; however, that interacts badly with gateways)77.782 324.944 Q ([I1.RFC2821] to non\255Internet mail and non\255mail systems \(where) 77.782 336.944 Q (DNS might not be available to the recipient\), it is not always)77.782 348.944 Q (easy to distinguish an unresolvable name from temporary failure)77.782 360.944 Q(or, worse, deliberate return of inappropriate response codes) 77.782 372.944 Q (from a name server [I2.SiteFinder], and if used widely might)77.782 384.944 Q(result in unreasonable load on the root nameservers.)77.782 396.944 Q 14.4(c. A)41.782 420.944 R (domain literal corresponding to no location might be used.)7.2 E (That would avoid DNS issues.)77.782 432.944 Q (Unfortunately, there is no IPv4)14.4 E (address that guarantees that characteristic [I3.RFC3330].)77.782 444.944 Q(There)14.4 E (is an IPv6 address range reserved for documentation)77.782 456.944 Q 7.2([I4.RFC3849]. There)77.782 468.944 R (have in the past been other reserved ranges)7.2 E 7.2 ([I5.RFC3701]. Finally,)77.782 480.944 R (there are a few other reserved IPv6)7.2 E (addresses as specified in [I6.RFC3513].)77.782 492.944 Q (In particular, the)14.4 E ([I6.RFC3513] "Unspecified" IPv6 address is potentially useful.)77.782 504.944 Q(Unfortunately, there are several problems with IPv6 domain) 63.382 528.944 Q(literals:)63.382 540.944 Q 14.4(i. IPv6)63.382 564.944 R(is not yet widely deployed)7.2 E 7.2(ii. In)63.382 588.944 R (particular, there does not appear to be widely\255deployed)7.2 E (recognition of [I1.RFC2821] \(as referenced by [N2.RFC2822]\))99.382 600.944 Q(tagged IPv6 domain literals.)99.382 612.944 Q (One [I1.RFC2821] representation)14.4 E (of the [I6.RFC3513] "Unspecified" IPv6 address is)99.382 624.944 Q 7.2 ("[IPv6:0::]". Many)99.382 636.944 R (implementations expect domain literals to)7.2 E (conform to the \(untagged\) IPv4 syntax of [I7.STD3])99.382 648.944 Q (iii. Domain literals are essentially opaque to end users.)63.382 672.944 Q(They do)14.4 E (not convey the desired semantics \(lack of an Internet mailbox)99.382 684.944 Q(or anonymity\).)99.382 696.944 Q 7.2(iv. There)63.382 720.944 R(are literally dozens of distinct but equivalent)7.2 E ([I1.RFC2821] tagged IPv6 representations of the "Unspecified")99.382 732.944 Q(IPv6 domain literal.)99.382 744.944 Q (That makes it difficult to educate end)14.4 E 122.4(Lilly Expires) 20.182 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E([Page 2])108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 3 3 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)56.692 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E (users about the semantics, since an end user might encounter)135.892 108.944 Q(any of many distinct representations.)135.892 120.944 Q 14.4 (v. There)99.892 144.944 R (is potential for interoperability problems: one type of)7.2 E ([I6.RFC3513] IPv6 address with embedded IPv4 address has the)135.892 156.944 Q(IPv4 address \(32 bits\) in an otherwise zero-valued IPv6) 135.892 168.944 Q 7.2(address. The)135.892 180.944 R ("Unspecified" IPv6 might mistakenly be)7.2 E (interpreted as an embedded IPv4 address of 0.0.0.0, which has)135.892 192.944 Q(semantics of "this" host on "this" network [I3.RFC3330], i.e.) 135.892 204.944 Q(similar to the loopback semantics.)135.892 216.944 Q (Any local\255part used with)14.4 E (that IPv6 "Unspecified" literal so interpreted might clash)135.892 228.944 Q (with a valid local\255part on the local system, which is hardly)135.892 240.944 Q(equivalent to the desired semantics of no Internet mailbox or) 135.892 252.944 Q(anonymity.)135.892 264.944 Q (Use of either a domain name or domain literal raises the issue of) 99.892 288.944 Q 7.2(as)99.892 300.944 S (uitable local\255part, and the issues with respect to)-7.2 E (interpretation of such a local\255part.)99.892 312.944 Q (Hosts are supposed to treat)14.4 E (local\255parts as opaque strings unless the domain matches the host's) 99.892 324.944 Q (domain \(which would never be the case for an unassigned domain)99.892 336.944 Q(name or "unspecified" domain literal\).)99.892 348.944 Q 7.2 (Af)99.892 372.944 S (ield body syntax change would be a problem for SMTP gateways,)-7.2 E (which are required to ensure that address fields contain content)99.892 384.944 Q (which is "effective and useful for sending replies" as specified)99.892 396.944 Q(in [I1.RFC2821].)99.892 408.944 Q 14.4(d. The)78.292 432.944 R (syntax of the From field might be changed to permit an empty)7.2 E (field body, i.e. zero or more mailboxes.)114.292 444.944 Q (While the Bcc field)14.4 E (has provision for an empty field body, the From field does not.)114.292 456.944 Q(Such a change would be incompatible with modern and past) 114.292 468.944 Q (implementations, as an empty From field body has never been)114.292 480.944 Q(legal.)114.292 492.944 Q (An empty field body presents problems for SMTP gateways, as noted) 99.892 516.944 Q 7.2(above. It)99.892 528.944 R (may also present problems for other protocols using)7.2 E (RFC 822 syntax, as noted below.)99.892 540.944 Q 14.4(e. The)78.292 564.944 R(syntax of the From field body might be changed to an address) 7.2 E(or address list rather than a mailbox list, allowing a named) 114.292 576.944 Q (group with an empty set of mailboxes, but that would not be)114.292 588.944 Q (compatible with modern deployed implementations which cannot be)114.292 600.944 Q (expected to cope with such an extension to syntax of the field;)114.292 612.944 Q(such syntax is explicitly prohibited by [N1.STD11] section) 114.292 624.944 Q 7.2(4.4.1. It)114.292 636.944 R (was, however, legal syntax under an earlier Message)7.2 E (Format RFC, viz. [I8.RFC733], and is legal in message header)114.292 648.944 Q(recipient address fields and the Reply\255To field.)114.292 660.944 Q (An alternate syntax change would be to permit an empty angle\255addr) 99.892 684.944 Q(in the mailbox specification.)99.892 696.944 Q (That too is currently incompatible)14.4 E (with specified syntax and might not be handled well by some)99.892 708.944 Q(deployed implementations.)99.892 720.944 Q (Like the above, such syntax was at one)14.4 E (time legal, and is presently permitted in some address fields)99.892 732.944 Q(\(e.g. Return\255Path\).)99.892 744.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires) 56.692 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E([Page 3])108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 4 4 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)20.182 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E (Syntax changes to RFC 822 would affect all protocols using the)63.382 108.944 Q(RFC 822 From field syntax, notably [I9.HTTP].)63.382 120.944 Q (As noted above, such a syntax change would raise issues with)63.382 144.944 Q(respect to SMTP gateway requirements.)63.382 156.944 Q 7.2(An) 63.382 180.944 S (ull mailbox or empty mailbox list \(in a named group address\))-7.2 E (does avoid issues related to DNS \(availability of service,)63.382 192.944 Q(nameserver load, resolver issues\), domain or domain literal) 63.382 204.944 Q(interpretation, and local\255part issues.)63.382 216.944 Q 14.4(f. It)41.782 240.944 R (is believed that the approach chosen in this memo, viz. to)7.2 E (make the From field OPTIONAL, has the least adverse impact on)77.782 252.944 Q(the Internet of the available solutions to the problem.)77.782 264.944 Q(It is)14.4 E (perhaps worth noting that the From field is optional in)77.782 276.944 Q([I9.HTTP].)77.782 288.944 Q 20.182 312.944 EBEGIN [/Title (2. Requirement Levels) /Dest (S2.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 20.182 312.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S2.) /Page 4 /View [ /FitH 516 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(2. Requirement Levels)20.182 312.944 Q (The key words "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", "MAY" and "OPTIONAL" in this)41.782 336.944 Q(document are to be interpreted as described in [N3.BCP14].) 41.782 348.944 Q 20.182 372.944 EBEGIN [/Title (3. Scope) /Dest (S3.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 20.182 372.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S3.) /Page 4 /View [ /FitH 456 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(3. Scope)20.182 372.944 Q (This memo \(if approved\) updates the Internet Message Format)41.782 396.944 Q(specification [N1.STD11], [N2.RFC2822] as used by various) 41.782 408.944 Q (applications \(electronic mail [I10.STD10], [I1.RFC2821], Usenet news) 41.782 420.944 Q ([I11.RFC1036], Internet fax [I12.RFC2305], VPIM [I13.RFC3801], EDI) 41.782 432.944 Q([I14.RFC1767], [I15.RFC1865], etc.\).)41.782 444.944 Q (It applies across the board to)14.4 E (applications using the Internet Message Format.)41.782 456.944 Q (However it does not)14.4 E (discuss similarly named fields in unrelated formats and protocols) 41.782 468.944 Q (such as [I9.HTTP] or [I16.SIP] \(HTTP uses the RFC 822 field syntax;) 41.782 480.944 Q(SIP does not\).)41.782 492.944 Q(This memo \(if approv\ ed\) relaxes a requirement of the Internet Message)41.782 516.944 Q 7.2 (Format. It)41.782 528.944 R (does not preclude specific applications from separately)7.2 E (requiring a From field, but authors of such specifications SHOULD) 41.782 540.944 Q (consider the situations discussed in this memo which have lead to the) 41.782 552.944 Q(relaxation of the Internet Message Format requirement.) 41.782 564.944 Q 20.182 588.944 EBEGIN [/Title (4. Amendment of STD 11 (RFC 822)) /Dest (S4.1.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 20.182 588.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S4.1.) /Page 4 /View [ /FitH 240 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(4. Amendment of STD 11 \(RFC 822\))20.182 588.944 Q 20.182 612.944 EBEGIN [/Title (4.1. RFC 822 section 4.1 SYNTAX) /Dest (S4.1.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 20.182 612.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S4.1.) /Page 4 /View [ /FitH 216 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(4.1. RFC 822 section 4.1 SYNTAX)20.182 612.944 Q 14.4(authentic =)77.782 636.944 R 43.2(["From" ":")14.4 F (mailbox] ; Single author)21.6 E 7.2(/\(")164.182 648.944 S 28.8 (Sender" ":")-7.2 F 7.2(mailbox ;)21.6 F(Actual submittor)7.2 E 43.2 (["From" ":")178.582 660.944 R(1#mailbox]\) ; Multiple authors)7.2 E 14.4(;o)394.582 672.944 S 7.2(rn)-14.4 G(ot sender)-7.2 E (resent\255authentic =)77.782 696.944 Q 36(["Resent\255From" ":")14.4 F (mailbox])14.4 E 7.2(/\(")207.382 708.944 S 21.6(Resent\255Sender" ":") -7.2 F(mailbox)21.6 E 36(["Resent\255From" ":")221.782 720.944 R (1#mailbox] \))7.2 E (The change is that From and Resent\255From fields are made optional.) 41.782 744.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires)20.182 768.944 R (September 15, 2005)7.2 E([Page 4])108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 5 5 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)56.692 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E 56.692 108.944 EBEGIN [/Title (4.2. RFC 822 section 4.4.2 SENDER / RESENTSENDER) /Dest (S4.2.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 108.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S4.2.) /Page 5 /View [ /FitH 720 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (4.2. RFC 822 section 4.4.2 SENDER / RESENT\255SENDER)56.692 108.944 Q (If the From field is omitted, a Sender field MAY be supplied, but it) 78.292 132.944 Q(is not REQUIRED.)78.292 144.944 Q 56.692 168.944 EBEGIN [/Title (4.3. RFC 822 section 4.4.4. AUTOMATIC USE OF FROM / SENDER / REPLYTO) /Dest (S4.3.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 168.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S4.3.) /Page 5 /View [ /FitH 660 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(4.3. RFC 822 section 4.4.4. AUTOMATIC USE OF FR\ OM / SENDER / REPLY\255TO)56.692 168.944 Q (Clearly in the cases under consideration in this memo \(author)78.292 192.944 Q (anonymity or lack of mailbox\), it is not possible to use a From field) 78.292 204.944 Q(if no such field is present.)78.292 216.944 Q (That is expected in the circumstances;)14.4 E (one cannot reply to an anonymous author, nor send Internet email to) 78.292 228.944 Q(an author with no Internet mailbox.)78.292 240.944 Q 56.692 264.944 EBEGIN [/Title (4.4. RFC 822 section A.2.6. Agent for user without online mailbox) /Dest (S4.4.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 264.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S4.4.) /Page 5 /View [ /FitH 564 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (4.4. RFC 822 section A.2.6. Agent for user without online mailbox) 56.692 264.944 Q 7.2(Af)164.692 288.944 S 7.2 (riend of George's, Sarah, is visiting.)-7.2 F(George's)21.6 E 7.2 (secretary sends some mail)128.692 300.944 R (to a friend of Sarah in computer\255)7.2 E 7.2(land. Replies)128.692 312.944 R(should go to George, whose mailbox is Jones)7.2 E(at)14.4 E (Registry.)128.692 324.944 Q(Comments: Sent on behalf of Sarah Friendly) 157.492 348.944 Q 14.4(Sender: Secy\255Name)157.492 360.944 R ()7.2 E(Reply\255To: Jones@Registry.)157.492 372.944 Q (The From field is removed, and a Comments field is added to indicate) 78.292 396.944 Q(the initiator of the communications.)78.292 408.944 Q 56.692 432.944 EBEGIN [/Title (5. Amendment of RFC 2822) /Dest (S5.1.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 432.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S5.1.) /Page 5 /View [ /FitH 396 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(5. Amendment of RFC 2822)56.692 432.944 Q 56.692 456.944 EBEGIN [/Title (5.1. RFC 2822 section 3.6. Field definitions) /Dest (S5.1.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 456.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S5.1.) /Page 5 /View [ /FitH 372 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(5.1. RFC 2822 section 3.6. Field definitions) 56.692 456.944 Q 79.2(from 0*)78.292 480.944 R 108(1S)100.8 G (ee sender and 3.6.2)-108 E (The minimum number of From fields is decreased to zero.)78.292 504.944 Q 56.692 528.944 EBEGIN [/Title (5.2. RFC 2822 section 3.6.2. Originator fields) /Dest (S5.2.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 528.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S5.2.) /Page 5 /View [ /FitH 300 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(5.2. RFC 2822 section 3.6.2. Originator fields) 56.692 528.944 Q(In the absence of the "Reply-To:" field,)243.892 552.944 Q(replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox\(es\) specif\ ied in the)78.292 564.944 Q ("From:" field, if present, unless otherwise specified by the person) 78.292 576.944 Q(composing the reply.)78.292 588.944 Q 7.2(AF)78.292 612.944 S(rom field cannot be used if not present.)-7.2 E 56.692 636.944 EBEGIN [/Title (5.3. RFC 2822 section 3.6.6. Resent fields) /Dest (S5.3.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 636.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S5.3.) /Page 5 /View [ /FitH 192 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(5.3. RFC 2822 section 3.6.6. Resent fields) 56.692 636.944 Q(The requirement for a Resent\255From field is waived i\ f the resender has)78.292 660.944 Q (no Internet mailbox or if the resender requires anonymity.)78.292 672.944 Q 56.692 696.944 EBEGIN [/Title (6. Impact Analysis) /Dest (S6.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 696.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S6.) /Page 5 /View [ /FitH 132 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(6. Impact Analysis)56.692 696.944 Q (The MIME media type message/rfc822 [I17.RFC2046], section 5.2.1,)78.292 720.944 Q(requires one of From, Subject, or Date fields.)78.292 732.944 Q(In the event that)14.4 E (there is no From field due to anonymity or lack of an Internet)78.292 744.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires)56.692 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E ([Page 5])108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 6 6 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)20.182 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E (mailbox, one of Subject or Date fields would have to be present in) 41.782 108.944 Q(order to comply with the [I17.RFC2046] requirements.) 41.782 120.944 Q (Message transport protocols [I10.STD10], [I1.RFC2821], [I18.STD53],) 41.782 144.944 Q ([I19.RFC3501], [I20.RFC977], etc. do not make use of the From field,) 41.782 156.944 Q(and so are not affected by this change.)41.782 168.944 Q(Similarly, MDNs \(Message Disposition Notifications\) [I21.RFC3798],) 41.782 192.944 Q (DSNs \(Disposition Status Notifications\) [I22.RFC3464], and MTSNs) 41.782 204.944 Q (\(Message Tracking Status Notifications\) [I23.RFC3886] do not use the) 41.782 216.944 Q (message header From field and are therefore unaffected.)41.782 228.944 Q(Some documents have suggested use of the reserved ".invalid" TLD) 41.782 252.944 Q (\(top\255level domain name\) [I24.BCP32] to provide some degree of) 41.782 264.944 Q 7.2(anonymity. With)41.782 276.944 R (relaxation of the requirement for a From field in)7.2 E (the Internet Message Format, such hacks and their negative impact on) 41.782 288.944 Q (the root name service are unnecessary, at least within the scope of) 41.782 300.944 Q(Internet Messages.)41.782 312.944 Q (Some message\255processing applications might assume the guaranteed) 41.782 336.944 Q(presence of a From header field.)41.782 348.944 Q (Robust applications likely make no)14.4 E (such assumption and are prepared for absence of the field, which can) 41.782 360.944 Q (occur due to message modification \(including truncation\) in transit,) 41.782 372.944 Q (due to message generator design or configuration issues, etc.)41.782 384.944 Q (Developers SHOULD NOT assume the presence of any particular field and) 41.782 396.944 Q(SHOULD carefully test applications for robustness.) 41.782 408.944 Q 20.182 432.944 EBEGIN [/Title (7. Acknowledgments) /Dest (S7.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 20.182 432.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S7.) /Page 6 /View [ /FitH 396 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(7. Acknowledgments)20.182 432.944 Q (The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments provided by) 41.782 456.944 Q(members of the ietf\255822 mailing list.)41.782 468.944 Q(In particular, Keith Moore and)14.4 E (Ned Freed have made detailed and useful comments.)41.782 480.944 Q 20.182 504.944 EBEGIN [/Title (8. Security Considerations) /Dest (S8.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 20.182 504.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S8.) /Page 6 /View [ /FitH 324 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(8. Security Considerations)20.182 504.944 Q (No new security considerations are addressed by this memo.)41.782 528.944 Q(This memo)14.4 E (relaxes requirements on the Internet Message Format specification) 41.782 540.944 Q (which have resulted in security problems \(specifically due to lack of) 41.782 552.944 Q 7.2(anonymity\). As)41.782 564.944 R (such, it improves security for message authors who)7.2 E (require anonymity.)41.782 576.944 Q (While this memo does not affect transport protocols, being limited in) 41.782 600.944 Q (scope to the Internet Message Format, users of that format should be) 41.782 612.944 Q (aware that transport protocols may provide a trail leading to the) 41.782 624.944 Q (message sender \(who might or might not be distinct from the author\).) 41.782 636.944 Q (Some protocols, notably [I25.RFC2476] might use authentication)41.782 648.944 Q(information to generate missing message header fields.)41.782 660.944 Q(Some SMTP)14.4 E ([I1.RFC2821] message transfer agent \(MTA\) implementations are known) 41.782 672.944 Q (to alter message content, including addition of message header)41.782 684.944 Q (originator fields, even though that practice is not legal except for) 41.782 696.944 Q(the specific case of gateways.)41.782 708.944 Q (Accordingly, authors should not rely)14.4 E (on omission of a From header field to provide anonymity without)41.782 720.944 Q(careful evaluation and testing of transport protocols.)41.782 732.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires)20.182 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E ([Page 6])108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 7 7 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)56.692 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E ([E]SMTP transport, [I1.RFC2821] [I25.RFC2476], carry in the SMTP)78.292 108.944 Q ("envelope" a return path intended for notifications of delivery)78.292 120.944 Q 7.2(problems. Placing)78.292 132.944 R (an author's \(as opposed to the sender's\) mailbox)7.2 E (in the SMTP envelope would defeat anonymity.)78.292 144.944 Q (Some user agents \(UAs\) might be configured to provide an indication) 78.292 168.944 Q (of the sender \(as sometimes distinct from author\) encoded in host) 78.292 180.944 Q (names \(as supplied in EHLO or HELO SMTP commands and recorded in) 78.292 192.944 Q(trace fields\) and/or message identifiers.)78.292 204.944 Q(In the case that the)14.4 E (author and sender are identical, such configurations make anonymity) 78.292 216.944 Q 7.2(impractical. Note)78.292 228.944 R (that in general it is possible to trace the)7.2 E (sender, so anonymity is only practical where the sender is not the) 78.292 240.944 Q(message author \(or one of the authors\).)78.292 252.944 Q(Arrangements for such true)14.4 E (anonymity -- where even the sender is unaware of the identity of the) 78.292 264.944 Q (author\(s\) -- \(e.g.. some sort of drop box\) are beyond the scope of) 78.292 276.944 Q(this memo.)78.292 288.944 Q(Developers and administrat\ ors of message submission agents \(MSAs\) and)78.292 312.944 Q (MTAs SHOULD carefully consider implications of breaching anonymity) 78.292 324.944 Q (and/or mistakenly associating an Internet mailbox with an author \(as) 78.292 336.944 Q (distinct from sender\) who has no such mailbox, and SHOULD design and) 78.292 348.944 Q (operate software with due consideration for those circumstances.)78.292 360.944 Q(Administrators SHOULD advise users and potential users of any) 78.292 372.944 Q (anonymity\255breaching configurations of MSAs or administered UAs.) 78.292 384.944 Q 56.692 408.944 EBEGIN [/Title (9. Internationalization Considerations) /Dest (S9.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 408.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S9.) /Page 7 /View [ /FitH 420 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(9. Internationalization Considerations)56.692 408.944 Q(This memo raises no new internationalization considerations.) 78.292 432.944 Q 56.692 456.944 EBEGIN [/Title (10. IANA Considerations) /Dest (S10.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 456.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (S10.) /Page 7 /View [ /FitH 372 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(10. IANA Considerations)56.692 456.944 Q (IANA shall update the From header field registration to include this) 78.292 480.944 Q (document's RFC number in the list of Specification Documents upon) 78.292 492.944 Q(approval by the IESG.)78.292 504.944 Q (At the same time, it would be helpful if IANA)14.4 E (were to provide useful and meaningful titles for the message header) 78.292 516.944 Q (field name registry lists, which currently are identified by the)78.292 528.944 Q (nonsensical phrases "header messages" and "message header messages".) 78.292 540.944 Q 56.692 576.944 EBEGIN [/Title (Appendix A. Change History) /Dest (SA.) /OUT pdfmark EEND 56.692 576.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (SA.) /Page 7 /View [ /FitH 252 ] /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(Appendix A. Change History)56.692 576.944 Q ([[This change history will not be part of a published RFC]])78.292 600.944 Q(-01 to -02)78.292 624.944 Q 16.8<8361>99.892 648.944 S (dded this change history)-16.8 E 16.8<8361>99.892 672.944 S (dded discussion of syntax change alternatives, with)-16.8 E(references) 123.892 684.944 Q 16.8<8361>99.892 708.944 S (dded discussion of domain literal alternative, with)-16.8 E(references) 123.892 720.944 Q 16.8<8361>99.892 744.944 S (dded discussion of assumptions about header field presence)-16.8 E 122.4(Lilly Expires)56.692 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E([Page 7]) 108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 8 8 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)20.182 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E 16.8<8365>63.382 108.944 S (xpanded discussion of security considerations, with)-16.8 E(references) 87.382 120.944 Q 16.8<8375>63.382 144.944 S(pdated acknowledgments)-16.8 E 16.8<8372>63.382 168.944 S(evised boilerplate)-16.8 E(-00 to -01) 41.782 192.944 Q 16.8<8363>63.382 216.944 S (onverted prose discussion of alternative approaches to)-16.8 E (numbered list)87.382 228.944 Q 16.8<8366>63.382 252.944 S (ixed RFC 822 revised ABNF line formatting \(line break\))-16.8 E (Normative References)20.182 276.944 Q([N1.STD11])41.782 300.944 Q 135.382 300.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (N1) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Crocker, D., "Standard for the format of ARPA Internet)135.382 300.944 Q(text messages", STD 11, RFC 822, August 1982.)135.382 312.944 Q ([N2.RFC2822])41.782 336.944 Q 135.382 336.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (N2) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Resnick, P., "Internet Message Format", RFC 2822, April)135.382 336.944 Q(2001.)135.382 348.944 Q([N3.BCP14])41.782 372.944 Q 135.382 372.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (N3) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate)135.382 372.944 Q (Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.)135.382 384.944 Q (Informative References)20.182 408.944 Q([I1.RFC2821])41.782 432.944 Q 156.982 432.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I1) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol",) 156.982 432.944 Q(RFC 2821, April 2001.)156.982 444.944 Q ([I2.SiteFinder])41.782 468.944 Q 156.982 468.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I2) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (SSAC Report: Redirection in the Com and Net Domains,)156.982 468.944 Q 7.2(AR)156.982 480.944 S(eport From the ICANN Security and Stability) -7.2 E(Advisory Committee \(SSAC\), 9 July 2004)156.982 492.944 Q ([I3.RFC3330])41.782 516.944 Q 156.982 516.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I3) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(IANA, "Special-Use IPv4 Addresses", RFC 3330,) 156.982 516.944 Q(September 2002.)156.982 528.944 Q([I4.RFC3849])41.782 552.944 Q 156.982 552.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I4) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Huston, G., Lord, A., and P. Smith, "IPv6 Address)156.982 552.944 Q (Prefix Reserved for Documentation", RFC 3849, July)156.982 564.944 Q (2004.)156.982 576.944 Q([I5.RFC3701])41.782 600.944 Q 156.982 600.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I5) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Fink, R. and R. Hinden, "6bone \(IPv6 Testing Address)156.982 600.944 Q (Allocation\) Phaseout", RFC 3701, March 2004.)156.982 612.944 Q ([I6.RFC3513])41.782 636.944 Q 156.982 636.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I6) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version)156.982 636.944 Q 7.2(6\()156.982 648.944 S (IPv6\) Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, April)-7.2 E(2003.)156.982 660.944 Q([I7.STD3])41.782 684.944 Q 156.982 684.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I7) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -) 156.982 684.944 Q(Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123, October) 156.982 696.944 Q(1989.)156.982 708.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires)20.182 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E([Page 8])108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 9 9 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)56.692 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E([I8.RFC733])78.292 108.944 Q 193.492 108.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I8) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(Crocker, D., Pogran, K., Vittal, J., and D.) 193.492 108.944 Q(Henderson, "Proposed official standard for the format) 193.492 120.944 Q(of ARPA Network messages", RFC 724, May 1977.)193.492 132.944 Q([I9.HTTP])78.292 156.944 Q 193.492 156.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I9) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and H. Frystyk,) 193.492 156.944 Q ("Hypertext Transfer Protocol \255\255 HTTP/1.0", RFC 1945,)193.492 168.944 Q(May 1996.)193.492 180.944 Q([I10.STD10])78.292 204.944 Q 193.492 204.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I10) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10,)193.492 204.944 Q (RFC 821, August 1982.)193.492 216.944 Q([I11.RFC1036])78.292 240.944 Q 193.492 240.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I11) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Horton, M. and R. Adams, "Standard for interchange of)193.492 240.944 Q (USENET messages", RFC 1036, December 1987.)193.492 252.944 Q ([I12.RFC2305])78.292 276.944 Q 193.492 276.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I12) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Toyoda, K., Ohno, H., Murai, J., and D. Wing, "A)193.492 276.944 Q (Simple Mode of Facsimile Using Internet Mail",)193.492 288.944 Q (RFC 2305, March 1998.)193.492 300.944 Q([I13.RFC3801])78.292 324.944 Q 193.492 324.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I13) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Vaudreuil, G. and G. Parsons, "Voice Profile for)193.492 324.944 Q (Internet Mail \255 version 2 \(VPIMv2\)", RFC 3801, June)193.492 336.944 Q(2004.)193.492 348.944 Q([I14.RFC1767])78.292 372.944 Q 193.492 372.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I14) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Crocker, D., "MIME Encapsulation of EDI Objects",)193.492 372.944 Q (RFC 1767, March 1995.)193.492 384.944 Q([I15.RFC1865])78.292 408.944 Q 193.492 408.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I15) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Houser, W., Griffin, J., and C. Hage, "EDI Meets the)193.492 408.944 Q (Internet Frequently Asked Questions about Electronic)193.492 420.944 Q (Data Interchange \(EDI\) on the Internet", RFC 1865,)193.492 432.944 Q (January 1996.)193.492 444.944 Q([I16.SIP])78.292 468.944 Q 193.492 468.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I16) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF(Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G.,) 193.492 468.944 Q(Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M.,) 193.492 480.944 Q(and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol",) 193.492 492.944 Q(RFC 3261, June 2002.)193.492 504.944 Q([I17.RFC2046]) 78.292 528.944 Q 193.492 528.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I17) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet)193.492 528.944 Q (Mail Extensions \(MIME\) Part Two: Media Types",)193.492 540.944 Q (RFC 2046, November 1996.)193.492 552.944 Q([I18.STD53])78.292 576.944 Q 193.492 576.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I18) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Myers, J. and M. Rose, "Post Office Protocol \255)193.492 576.944 Q (Version 3", STD 53, RFC 1939, May 1996.)193.492 588.944 Q ([I19.RFC3501])78.292 612.944 Q 193.492 612.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I19) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Crispin, M., "INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL \255)193.492 612.944 Q (VERSION 4rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003.)193.492 624.944 Q([I20.RFC977]) 78.292 648.944 Q 193.492 648.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I20) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Kantor, B. and P. Lapsley, "Network News Transfer)193.492 648.944 Q (Protocol", RFC 977, February 1986.)193.492 660.944 Q([I21.RFC3798]) 78.292 684.944 Q 193.492 684.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I21) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Hansen, T. and G. Vaudreuil, "Message Disposition)193.492 684.944 Q (Notification", RFC 3798, May 2004.)193.492 696.944 Q([I22.RFC3464]) 78.292 720.944 Q 193.492 720.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I22) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Moore, K. and G. Vaudreuil, "An Extensible Message)193.492 720.944 Q (Format for Delivery Status Notifications", RFC 3464,)193.492 732.944 Q (January 2003.)193.492 744.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires)56.692 768.944 R (September 15, 2005)7.2 E([Page 9])108 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 10 10 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)20.182 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E([I23.RFC3886])41.782 108.944 Q 156.982 108.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I23) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Allman, E., "An Extensible Message Format for Message)156.982 108.944 Q (Tracking Responses", RFC 3886, September 2004.)156.982 120.944 Q ([I24.BCP32])41.782 144.944 Q 156.982 144.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I24) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Eastlake 3rd, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level)156.982 144.944 Q (DNS Names", BCP 32, RFC 2606, June 1999.)156.982 156.944 Q ([I25.RFC2476])41.782 180.944 Q 156.982 180.944 EBEGIN [/Dest (I25) /DEST pdfmark EEND/F0 12/Courier@0 SF (Gellens, R. and J. Klensin, "Message Submission",)156.982 180.944 Q (RFC 2476, December 1998.)156.982 192.944 Q(Author's Address)20.182 216.944 Q(Bruce Lilly)41.782 240.944 Q(Email: blilly@erols.com)41.782 264.944 Q(Full Copyright Statement)20.182 288.944 Q 7.2 (Copyright \251 The)41.782 312.944 R(Internet Society \(2005\).)7.2 E (This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions) 41.782 336.944 Q (contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the author)41.782 348.944 Q(retains all his rights.)41.782 360.944 Q (This document and the information contained herein are provided on an) 41.782 384.944 Q ("AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE REPRESENTS OR) 41.782 396.944 Q (IS SPONSORED BY \(IF ANY\), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET) 41.782 408.944 Q (ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,) 41.782 420.944 Q (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE)41.782 432.944 Q (INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED)41.782 444.944 Q (WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.) 41.782 456.944 Q(Intellectual Property Statement)20.182 480.944 Q (The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any) 41.782 504.944 Q (Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to) 41.782 516.944 Q (pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in) 41.782 528.944 Q (this document or the extent to which any license under such rights) 41.782 540.944 Q (might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has) 41.782 552.944 Q (made any independent effort to identify any such rights.)41.782 564.944 Q(Information)14.4 E (on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be)41.782 576.944 Q(found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.)41.782 588.944 Q (Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any)41.782 612.944 Q (assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an)41.782 624.944 Q (attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of) 41.782 636.944 Q (such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this)41.782 648.944 Q(specification can be obtained from the IETF on\255line IPR repository\ at)41.782 660.944 Q(http://www.ietf.org/ipr.)41.782 672.944 Q (The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any) 41.782 696.944 Q (copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary)41.782 708.944 Q (rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement) 41.782 720.944 Q(this standard.)41.782 732.944 Q (Please address the information to the IETF at)14.4 E (ietf\255ipr@ietf.org.)41.782 744.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires)20.182 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E([Page 10])100.8 E 0 Cg EP %%Page: 11 11 %%BeginPageSetup BP %%EndPageSetup /F0 12/Courier@0 SF 64.8(Internet\255Draft From)56.692 84.944 R (Field Made Optional)7.2 E(March 2005)100.8 E(Acknowledgment)56.692 108.944 Q (Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the)78.292 132.944 Q(Internet Society.)78.292 144.944 Q 122.4(Lilly Expires)56.692 768.944 R(September 15, 2005)7.2 E([Page 11])100.8 E 0 Cg EP %%Trailer end %!Description: PostScript ISO A4 version of draft-lilly-from-optional-03 %%EOF