![]() |
![]() |
2. Select a stream, river, or lake using data found on the Internet that has excellent scores on an Index of Water Quality.
3. Locate the river, stream, or lake on a map.
Write a team letter to Bruce Babbitt, the US Secretary
of the Department of the Interior, explaining your choice of a water site
for the next US National Park based on your analysis of the Water Quality
Indices of America's Rivers, Streams and Lakes. Be sure to include the
science data you have researched on the web to convince Mr. Babbitt. He
may not understand dissolved oxygen and such, so explain your ideas clearly.
Your letter should be revised for organization of thought and edited for
spelling and grammar. Your team members should be able to orally describe
how the group determined which would be the best spot for a national park.
How Long Do We Have For This Project?
Time Allotted for this project: Two one-hour sessions.
Scientist(s) - learn about the four factors of Water Quality
Geographer - place your water site on a map
Writer - write your team's letter
2. Get working:
Scientists need to begin researching the Internet sites
TransAmerica Explorers "Health of America's Waters"
Internet Sites for Understanding Water Sampling
Learning
about the Four Factors: Oxygen, Conductivity, PH, Temperature
Eighteen
Water Sites in America
Jason Project
-
Science
Information about Water Studies
Results of Water Studies in America
The writer needs to begin the letter using the proper inside addresses. As the scientist(s) find information about the four factors, begin explaining them to Mr. Babbitt so that he will understand how you made your choice.
The geographer needs to find maps that will
be helpful to be attached to the team letter to Mr. Babbitt, pinpointing
the team recommendation for the new national park. You may want to search
in Yahooligans
for a map.
All should save their work on their own disk.
3. After working for twenty minutes, call a team meeting to share results and new ideas to date. Make plans for the rest of the time allotted. All team members need to agree on the final site and be able to orally describe their reasons based on scientific information.
4. At the beginning of the second session, review the team progress toward accomplishing the goal and make plans for this work period.
Final Assessments - Rating Rubric
5 - Top work
4 - Good work 3 - Fair work
2 - Poor work
__l. My effort for both sessions
__2. The quality of our Scientific research about
our water site
__3. The quality of our letter to Secretary Babbitt
(well-written, edited, correct format for addressing)
__4. The accuracy of our map
__5. Our ability to use several resources to collect
our research and then put the research into one convincing letter
__6. We used our time efficiently
5. When you turn in the team letter and map, on the back of the map, answer the following questions:
What was the easiest part of this quest? Why?
What was the hardest part of this quest? Why?
How does an Internet Quest compare with researching
using books?